The Biplane Forum > Biplane Technical Forums > Firewall Forward & Fuel System > AVgas vs. Mogas


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2007, 04:30 PM   #1
Randy
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville, Mich.
Posts: 1,326
Liked 11 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Send a message via MSN to Randy
Default

This is from another site. Thought some of you might be interested, especially in the last couple of paragraphs, that were concerned about fuels during the EAA correspondence thread. I thought it interesting that they refer to Lycoming metallurgy as "dated." Looks like they could build an engine capable of using Mogas if they wanted to:

Here is a note on auto fuel in aviation that explains why the bubbles form in the clear fuel lines. It is mentioned in the comparison of Avgas to other fuels. Thought I would pass it along. JohnD

I did a google search "Lead in gas" and came up with many hits. I read several but thought I'd post this for anyone interested to read. It lists lead contents of 80/87 100LL and 100/130.
Dave Conrad
Avgas is a high-octane fuel used for aircraft and, in the past, racing cars. Avgas is a portmanteau for aviation gasoline, as distinguished from mogas (motor gasoline), which is the everyday gasoline used in cars. Avgas is used in aircraft that use piston or Wankel engines; gas turbines can operate on avgas, but typically do not. Turbine and diesel engines are designed to use kerosene-based jet fuel.

[edit]
Avgas properties and varieties

Avgas has a lower volatility than mogas (i.e. it does not evaporate as quickly), which can be important for high-altitude use and higher temperatures. The particular mixtures in use today are the same as when they were first developed in the 1950s and 1960s, and therefore the high-octane ratings are achieved by the addition of tetra-ethyl lead (TEL), a highly toxic substance that was phased out for car use in most countries in the 1980s. The main petroleum component used in blending avgas is alkylate, which is essentially a mixture of various isooctanes, and some refineries also use some reformate.
Avgas is currently available in several grades with differing maximum lead concentrations. Since TEL is a rather expensive additive, a minimum amount of it is typically added to the fuel to bring it up to the required octane rating so actual concentrations are often lower than the maximum.
Jet fuel is not avgas. It is similar to kerosene and is used in turbine engines. In Europe, environmental and cost considerations have led to increasing numbers of aircraft being fitted with highly fuel-efficient diesel engines; these too run on jet fuel. Civilian aircraft use Jet-A, Jet-A1 or in severely cold climates Jet-B. There are other classification systems for military turbine and diesel fuel. See Jet fuel.

[edit]
Gasoline
Gasoline used for aviation fuel generally has two numbers associated with its octane rating. Examples of this include the (now almost completely unavailable) 80/87 avgas, and the 100/130 avgas. The first number indicates the octane rating of the fuel tested to "aviation lean" standards, which is similar to the Motor Octane Number (MON) rating given to automotive gasoline. The second number indicates the octane rating of the fuel tested to the "aviation rich" standard, which tries to simulate a supercharged condition with a rich mixture, elevated temperatures, and a high manifold pressure.
100LL, spoken as "100 low lead", contains a lead based anti-knock compound but less than the "highly-leaded" 100/130 avgas it effectively replaced. Most piston aircraft engines require 100LL but it is scheduled to be phased out in the United States because of the lead toxicity. An alternative fuel has not yet been developed for these engines. While there are similar engines that burn non-leaded fuels aircraft are often purchased with engines that use 100LL because many airports only have 100LL. 100LL contains a maximum of 2 grams of lead per US gallon, or maximum 0.56 grams/litre and is the most commonly available and used aviation gasoline.
82UL is an unleaded fuel similar to automobile gasoline but without additives. It may be used in aircraft that have a Supplemental Type Certificate for the use of automobile gasoline with an aviation lean octane rating (MON) of 82 or less or an antiknock index of 87 or less. It may not be used in engines that require 100LL. See Octane Rating. The FAA highly recommends installing placards stating the use of 82UL is or is not approved on those airplanes that specify unleaded autogas (mogas) as an approved fuel[1].
Gasoline (MOGAS) may be used in aircraft that have a Supplemental Type Certificate for automotive gasoline. Most of these applicable aircraft have low-compression engines which were originally certified to run on 80/87 avgas and require only "regular" 87 anti-knock index automotive gasoline. Examples of this include the popular Cessna 172 or Piper Cherokee with the 150 hp variant of the Lycoming O-320. Some aircraft engines were originally certified using a 91/96 avgas and have STC's available to run "premium" 91 anti-knock index automotive gasoline. Examples of this include some Cherokee's with the 160 hp Lycoming O-320 or 180 hp O-360 or the Cessna 152 with the O-235.
Avgas 80/87 has the lowest lead content at a maximum of 0.5 grams lead per U.S. gallon, and is only used in low compression ratio engines.
Avgas 100/130 is a higher octane grade aviation gasoline, containing a maximum of 4 grams of lead per US gallon, maximum 1.12 grams/litre. 100LL "low lead" was designed to replace avgas 100/130.
In the past other grades were also available, particularly for military use, such as avgas 115/145 and 91/96. Note that the octanes of avgas cannot be directly compared to those of mogas, as a different test engine and method is used to determine the octane. The first (lower) number is the lean mixture rating, the second (higher) number is the rich mixture rating. For mogas, the octane rating is typically expressed in the U.S. as an anti-knock index (known as "pump rating"), which is the average of the octane rating based on the research and motor test method ((R+M)/2).
Fuel dyes aid pilots in identifying the proper fuel in their aircraft. 80/87 is red, 100/130 is green, 115/145 is purple (leading to the U.S. Naval aviation slang term "grape juice" for avgas) and 100LL is blue, while jet fuel, JET A1, is clear or straw, being undyed. Untaxed diesel fuel for off-road use is also dyed red.
The annual U.S. usage of avgas was 236 million gallons (893 million liters) in 2006. [2]

[edit]
Avgas compared to other fuels

Many general aviation aircraft engines were designed to run on 80/87 octane, roughly the standard for automobiles today. Direct conversions to run on automotive fuel are fairly common and applied via the supplemental type certificate (STC) process. However, the alloys used in aviation engine construction are rather outdated, and engine wear in the valves is a potential problem on automotive gasoline conversions. Fortunately, significant history of mogas-converted engines has shown that very few engine problems are actually caused by automotive gasoline. A larger problem stems from the wider range of allowable vapor pressures found in automotive gasoline; this can pose some risk to aviation users if fuel system design considerations are not taken into account. Automotive gasoline can vaporize in fuel lines causing a vapor lock (a bubble in the line), starving the engine of fuel. This does not constitute an insurmountable obstacle, but merely requires examination of the fuel system, ensuring adequate shielding from high temperatures and maintaining sufficient pressure in the fuel lines. This is the main reason why both the specific engine model as well as the aircraft in which it is installed must be supplementally certified for the conversion. A good example of this is the Piper Cherokee with high-compression 160 hp or 180 hp engines. Only later versions of the airframe with different engine cowling and exhaust arrangements are applicable for the automotive fuel STC, and even then require fuel system modifications.
Vapor lock typically occurs in fuel systems where a mechanically-driven fuel pump mounted on the engine draws fuel from a tank mounted lower than the pump. The reduced pressure in the line can cause the more volatile components in automotive gasoline to flash into vapor, forming bubbles in the fuel line and interrupting fuel flow. If an electric boost pump is mounted in the fuel tank to push fuel toward the engine, as is common practice in fuel-injected automobiles, the fuel pressure in the lines is maintained above ambient pressure, preventing bubble formation. Likewise, if the fuel tank is mounted above the engine and fuel flows primarily due to gravity, as in a Cessna high-wing airplane, vapor lock cannot occur, using either aviation or automotive fuels.
In addition to vapor locking potential, automotive gasoline does not have the same quality tracking as aviation gasoline. To help solve this problem, an aviation fuel known as 82UL has recently been introduced. This fuel is essentially automotive gasoline that has additional quality tracking and restrictions on permissible additives.
The main consumers of avgas at present (mid-2000s) are in North America, Australia, Brazil, and Africa (mainly South Africa).
In Europe, avgas prices are so high that there have been a number of efforts to convert the industry to diesel instead, which is common, inexpensive and has a number of advantages for aviation use. However, avgas remains the most common fuel in Europe as well.

[edit]
Properties

Avgas has a density of 6.02 lb/US gallon at 15 °C, or 0.72 kg/l, and this density is commonly used for weight and balance computation. Density increases to 6.40 lb/US gallon at -40 °C, and decreases by about 0.5% per 5 °C increase in temperature.[3]



__________________
Randy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-05-2010, 06:50 PM   #2
Guido Lepore
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Guido Lepore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 349
Liked 26 Times on 19 Posts
Likes Given: 10

Send a message via MSN to Guido Lepore
Default


Any update on this? We can still buy non-ethanol 94 octane gas at the pump here for less than $4/gal. Last summer 100LL hit over $7/gal will probably be more this year.

I flew a Rotax 912S the other day and we jugged in 94 octane Mogas, and it has a 10.5:1 compression ratio! My old-school Lyc has 9:1 at best. I've added 5 gal of Mogas to the tank a few times when stuck in podunckville without avgas just to get home. At 100/year and 10gal/hr that $3/gal is gonna save $3000.

Are we all going to burn 100LL until the tap quits, then switch to mogas and regret not doing it sooner? I mean, in a few hundred hours you've already saved the cost of an engine overhaul.

Edited by: Guido Lepore


__________________
Guido Lepore is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-06-2010, 01:11 AM   #3
TFF1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Memphis,TN
Posts: 1,079
Liked 133 Times on 108 Posts

Default

The Rotax has an advantage because the pistons are small in diameter. The flame front is small enough that it cant find a lean area and start to detonate. Detonation is easy to get started on a 5" diameter piston compared to a 3" one; that is why they can run higher compressions. The Lycoming reps keep saying they are readying for the no lead time for most of their engines. The roller cams are for the day they get rid of Zinc in the Av oils just like the auto oil, so I think they have been told what is to come. The reps say the new unleaded Avgas will have the vapor pressures like leaded so it wont be auto fuel, but because it is unleaded the "local" refinery will be able to mix it up instead of 2-3 that can make leaded now. The big thing is because the government will put it into effect, it will cost us no matter what.

__________________
TFF1 is online now  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-06-2010, 12:39 PM   #4
darylat8750
Moderator
BiP_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
darylat8750's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: laramie, wy, usa
Posts: 2,180
Liked 86 Times on 69 Posts
Likes Given: 85

Send a message via MSN to darylat8750
Default

Tom has it right. Smaller bore = easier to control flame front. The modern combustion chambers also have a large proportion of squish area. The new 600cc motorcycles are using static CRs of around 13 to 1 and are very civilized around town and make buckets of power. Do note that is static CR. The cam timing is radical enough that the effective CR at lower RPMs is considerably lower and they are up above 4000 rpm before they approach effective CRs near static. Some claim effective CRs above 13-1 in the 9000-12000 rpm range. The cam timing is so mild on airplane engines that there is not nearly the difference between static and effective CRs.

__________________
darylat8750 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Free Food and Cheap Avgas Hangar Talk 2 04-28-2007 09:06 AM