• The Biplane Forum is a large global active community of biplane builders, owners and pilots. From Pitts to Skybolts, to older barnstormers, all types are welcome. In addition to our active community, our content boasts exhaustive technical information which is often sought after for projects and maintenance. This information has accumulated over the 12+ years the forum has been in existence.

    The Biplane Forum is a private community. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched source of information not found anywhere else on the web. We are also a great resource for non biplane users, since many GA aircraft are built the same way (fabric and tube construction). Annual membership also comes with two BiplaneForum.com decals.



Elevator trim: incidence jackscrew or tab?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

LauraJ

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
3,914
Reaction score
1,201
Location
Seattle, WA
The Marquart Charger plans call for a jackscrew to trim the elevator, changing the leading edge height relative to the trailing edge, changing the angle of incidence of the horizontal stabilizer. This system feels positively baroque to me, as 100% of my experience to date has been in planes with a trim tab. The tab feels simpler, less prone to maladjustment (ask freerangequark about how his trim system was off by enough to cause landing problems), and lighter. An obvious downside of trying to go with a tab on the Charger is determining a good neutral incidence angle if the horizontal stabilizer is to be in a fixed position.

Other than the standard, "Stick to the plans, son," argument, what are the pros and cons of the two systems that I'm missing?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top