• The Biplane Forum is a large global active community of biplane builders, owners and pilots. From Pitts to Skybolts, to older barnstormers, all types are welcome. In addition to our active community, our content boasts exhaustive technical information which is often sought after for projects and maintenance. This information has accumulated over the 12+ years the forum has been in existence.

    The Biplane Forum is a private community. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched source of information not found anywhere else on the web. We are also a great resource for non biplane users, since many GA aircraft are built the same way (fabric and tube construction). Annual membership also comes with two BiplaneForum.com decals.



Flutter and mass balancing

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Dances_with_cumulus

Active Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
26
Reaction score
4
I am hoping to start a poll on how many skybolts are out there flying with and without mass balanced elevators?

I have heard the mass was added to the plans due to a single alleged flutter event but I find it odd that the logic to add mass was not applied to the rudder as well. The rudder sure looks like an elevator turned 90 degrees and it has far more opportunity to flutter given its stiffness comes from a pilots feet, which may or may not be pressing hard on the rudder pedals. Yet the rudders on skybolts aren’t mass balanced. Go figure.

I read somewhere that none of the Pitts plans call for mass balancing. If true, it’s an interesting question why the skybolt needs it, given one is a scale up of the other.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top