• The Biplane Forum is a large global active community of biplane builders, owners and pilots. From Pitts to Skybolts, to older barnstormers, all types are welcome. In addition to our active community, our content boasts exhaustive technical information which is often sought after for projects and maintenance. This information has accumulated over the 12+ years the forum has been in existence.

    The Biplane Forum is a private community. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched source of information not found anywhere else on the web. We are also a great resource for non biplane users, since many GA aircraft are built the same way (fabric and tube construction). Annual membership also comes with two BiplaneForum.com decals.



Lycoming Sumps, are some better?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

EAABipe40FF

Registered Users
Supporting Member
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
7,304
Reaction score
1,879
Location
Springfield, WV
Good news. My recent purchase O290 turns out to be near new inside. A friend has bored 2 of 4 case holes to take O320 cylinders and I have 4 narrow deck cylinders lined-up. I do need a new sump to accept my Bendix servo.

There is a complete assembly available off a IO320B1A w/rear mount I will probably buy because that is what I had and all my controls will fit.

But the question. There are different sump configurations, different both internally and different intake tubes.

Are some better regarding flow and/or charge distribution? Or maybe the different internal configuration coupled with intake tubes make them close to each other? Of coarse FI may be better than a carb. too?

Just wonder?

Jack
 

Latest posts

Back
Top