• The Biplane Forum is a large global active community of biplane builders, owners and pilots. From Pitts to Skybolts, to older barnstormers, all types are welcome. In addition to our active community, our content boasts exhaustive technical information which is often sought after for projects and maintenance. This information has accumulated over the 12+ years the forum has been in existence.

    The Biplane Forum is a private community. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched source of information not found anywhere else on the web. We are also a great resource for non biplane users, since many GA aircraft are built the same way (fabric and tube construction). Annual membership also comes with two BiplaneForum.com decals.



Tail handles

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

LauraJ

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
3,914
Reaction score
1,201
Location
Seattle, WA
I have a question about the placement of tail handles (the handles which typically appear on the lower longeron just forward of the empennage on many taildraggers): Why are they on the lower longeron?

Any time I have to move the Champ (which has this type of handle), I nearly break my back bending way over and then attempting to apply any movement pressure to the handles, and usually end up pushing on the leading edge of the horizontal stab as well (right at the root, of course). It's too heavy to reasonably lift and move, though the dynamics of it would be easier to manage.

If the handle were on the upper longeron, it would be noticeably more useful for actually moving the plane, just from a body mechanics point of view.

The main reason I can think of is aerodynamics. We try very hard to avoid putting drag-inducing stuff on the top of flying surfaces to avoid breaking up the laminar airflow, and presumably this falls into that category as well (though as I recall, the tail generally provides a bit of negative lift at cruise, so it may be that the lower surface is more important to keep turbulence-free).

Does anyone know?

charger-w-arrow-600x398.jpg
 

Latest posts

Back
Top