• The Biplane Forum is a large global active community of biplane builders, owners and pilots. From Pitts to Skybolts, to older barnstormers, all types are welcome. In addition to our active community, our content boasts exhaustive technical information which is often sought after for projects and maintenance. This information has accumulated over the 12+ years the forum has been in existence.

    The Biplane Forum is a private community. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched source of information not found anywhere else on the web. We are also a great resource for non biplane users, since many GA aircraft are built the same way (fabric and tube construction). Annual membership also comes with two BiplaneForum.com decals.



Constant speed vs fixed pitch

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

luftwicker07

Multiply your time and money estimate by 3
*
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
324
Reaction score
215
Location
Jacksonville, Florida
So I've always liked the efficiency of constant speed (who wouldn't) but I love the simplicity and lack of extra parts and weight of a fixed pitch. I've been considering the Catto or MT composite fixed pitch, but a few folks have suggested using a constant speed in my S1SS build. So the question is, which is the best option and why? I'm a heavy guy and I'm trying to keep my Pitts as light as possible. But if constant speed gives me an edge in competition, I'll consider the option.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top