• The Biplane Forum is a large global active community of biplane builders, owners and pilots. From Pitts to Skybolts, to older barnstormers, all types are welcome. In addition to our active community, our content boasts exhaustive technical information which is often sought after for projects and maintenance. This information has accumulated over the 12+ years the forum has been in existence.

    The Biplane Forum is a private community. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched source of information not found anywhere else on the web. We are also a great resource for non biplane users, since many GA aircraft are built the same way (fabric and tube construction). Annual membership also comes with two BiplaneForum.com decals.



Kip Aero Sopwiths and rotary or radial engine

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Dec 19, 2016
Messages
10
Reaction score
3
Location
Montana
I've been seriously been considering building a WW1 airplane for several years. I want it as authentic as practical, and am really looking at the Kip Aero Sopwith 1 1/2 strutter. I briefly talked to Kermit Weeks at Air Venture a few years ago, and his recommendation for the best flying WW1 airplane is the Sopwith Pup. Can't get much better than that. I want 2 seats, and figure the strutter should fit the bill with similar flying qualities (since the pup is a downsized strutter). I need to be able to operate by myself, and don't want to be on a short leash from my airstrip from worrying about the engine dying. The new rotary engines from New Zeland look interesting, but are largely untested. Would any of the new, small radials be a better choice for dependability and operation - such as the Verner? Which one? Does anybody have any experience with the new rotaries, or using a small radial instead, please?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top